USS Diligence (AFDL-48)

Name
USS Diligence
Hull designation
AFDL-48
Vessel class
Reliance
Evidence tier
Tier 2
Evidence entries
12
Record ID
uss-diligence-afdl48
Dataset version
2026.10.12-rc.1
Canonical URL
https://asbestosatlas.org/ships/uss-diligence-afdl48

Evidence

12 evidence entries recorded; each entry has a stable permalink (#ev-1 … #ev-12).

  1. [1]NavSource Naval History, Service Ship Photo Archive - Diligence (AFDL-48) page 09/67/6748.htm [other_primary]
    Locator
    AFDL-48 page timeline block and specifications block (all physical spec fields 'unknown'); page last updated 2013-12-06
    Finding type
    vessel_history
    Finding
    NavSource Service Ship Photo Archive timeline for Diligence (AFDL-48): laid down, date unknown, by General Construction Co.; delivered in 1955 and placed in service as AFDL-48; named Diligence (AFDL-48), date unknown; placed out of service, date unknown; struck from the Naval Register, date unknown; sold 11 December 1986 to SWM San Diego, later Knight & Carver; resold in 2013 to Peruvian interests; installed at Paita, Peru, 7 October 2013. Awards entry carries the National Defense Service Medal. NavSource notes no DANFS history exists for this hull.
    Verification
    partial
    Role
    supporting
    Documentation level
    ship_specific
    Accessed
    2026-09-20
    Study period
    1955-2013
    Population
    Navy service-craft crew (size undocumented)
    Limitations
    NavSource is the standard volunteer-compiled service-craft reference, not a government record; it is the only located source for several milestones (the 1986-12-11 sale date, the 2013-10-07 Paita installation date, the naming/out-of-service/stricken 'date unknown' entries, the NDSM award). The builder, 1955 delivery, 1986 SWM sale, Knight & Carver link, and 2013 Peruvian sale are independently corroborated by the shipbuildinghistory table and the California Water Board permit record (see ev-02, ev-03). No asbestos information in the source.
    Atlas source
    true
    Evidence ID
    ev-uss-diligence-afdl48-01
  2. [2]shipbuildinghistory.com 'US Navy Dry Docks AFDB AFDM AFDL ARDM ARD YFD' table (Tim Colton compilation), AFDL-48 row [other_primary]
    Locator
    auxafd.htm AFDL table, row 48 (post-WWII acquisition section)
    Finding type
    vessel_history
    Finding
    Independent secondary corroboration: the shipbuildinghistory.com U.S. Navy floating-drydock table lists 'AFDL | 48 | Diligence | General Const. | Seattle WA | 1955 | Sold 1986 to SWM San Diego, later at Knight & Carver, sold 2013 to Peruvian interests' - the row appears under the table's post-WWII-acquisition section, consistent with the 1955 delivery and distinct from the WWII-program AFD/ARDC hulls (AFD-1 through ARDC-13/AFDL-46) and from ex-ARD-33 Reliance (AFDL-47).
    Verification
    partial
    Role
    supporting
    Documentation level
    ship_specific
    Accessed
    2026-09-20
    Study period
    1955-2013
    Limitations
    Reputable secondary compilation corroborating builder, build location, delivery year, and the 1986/2013 disposition chain; the compiler's own table header warns drydock builder attribution records are incomplete. Not a primary record and contains no asbestos information.
    Atlas source
    true
    Evidence ID
    ev-uss-diligence-afdl48-02
  3. [3]California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region - Executive Officer Summary Report (2010-09-08) and Tentative Order R9-2010-0096 modifying NPDES Order R9-2005-0149 (NPDES No. CA0109088) [other_primary]
    Locator
    EOSR item 8 (purpose, discussion, background sections); Order findings 2-4 and discharge table; sup. doc. Sup_Doc_2_Tent_Order_add_drydock.pdf
    Finding type
    environmental_record
    Finding
    Government regulatory record naming the hull: the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board's September 8, 2010 agenda action (Tentative Order R9-2010-0096 modifying Order R9-2005-0149, NPDES CA0109088) documents 'a 4,000-ton drydock (Diligence)' purchased from BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair, Inc. and relocated to the Knight and Carver Yachtcenter facility approximately 3 miles south in San Diego Bay. The Order adds Discharge Point BW-001 (Diligence) at 32 deg 39' 33'' N on the floating drydock, prohibits discharge of anything other than San Diego Bay water from the drydock's ballast tanks, and notes the drydock is covered under the federal Vessel General Permit 'when it is underway as a vessel,' coverage transferred to the new owner. The Executive Officer Summary Report states the drydock 'was previously operated by BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair.'
    Verification
    verified
    Role
    supporting
    Documentation level
    ship_specific
    Accessed
    2026-09-20
    Study period
    2010
    Population
    Knight & Carver / BAE ship-repair workforce at the San Diego Bay facilities
    Limitations
    Official state regulatory record establishing the drydock's name (Diligence), ~4,000-ton lift capacity, BAE-to-Knight & Carver ownership transfer, and San Diego Bay siting in 2010 - the segment of the custody chain connecting the Navy's 1986 SWM sale to the 2013 Peruvian resale. The permit record contains no asbestos, materials, or construction information; it documents discharge regulation, not hull history. Linkage of this commercial 'Diligence' to ex-AFDL-48 rests on the NavSource/Colton chain (ev-01, ev-02) plus this record's matching name, capacity class, and operator sequence.
    Atlas source
    true
    Evidence ID
    ev-uss-diligence-afdl48-03
  4. [4]SEC EDGAR - United Defense Industries definitive merger agreement with BAE Systems North America (2005-03) and UDI acquisition announcement; MarineLink 'Knight & Carver Acquires 4K Ton Dry Dock' and 'Knight & Carver Yachtcenter Gets 400-Ft Drydock' (sourcing The Log Newspaper); San Diego Union-Tribune 2009-09-10 'Cleaned-up Star of India to return to Embarcadero'; CoatingsPro (NACE) '19th Century Sailing Ship Gets 21st Century Ceramic Armor' (doi 10.5006/cp2010_10_1-40) [other_primary]
    Locator
    SEC EDGAR w06528exv99w1.htm (UDI-BAE merger announcement) and w06528exv2w1.htm (merger agreement); encyclopedia.com BAE Systems Ship Repair timeline (SWM renamed 2005); marinelink.com articles 334437 and 335596; sandiegouniontribune.com 2009-09-10; doi.org/10.5006/cp2010_10_1-40
    Finding type
    vessel_history
    Finding
    Commercial-era reporting documents the drydock's San Diego service: (a) the corporate chain into BAE is documented to SEC level - Southwest Marine became a United Defense Industries subsidiary (2002) and was renamed BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair after BAE Systems' June 2005 acquisition of UDI (SEC-filed merger agreement, 2005-03); (b) Knight & Carver YachtCenter's 2010 acquisition of the 4,000-ton dry dock 'named Diligence,' financed by investor group Diligence & Company LLC with investment partner Fraser's Services and operated by K&C under exclusive long-term lease - the largest megayacht/commercial-vessel lift on the West Coast at the time, able to dock vessels up to 400 ft by 100 ft; (c) The Log Newspaper report (via MarineLink) of the 400-ft, 63-ft-tall drydock moved through San Diego Bay by a tug fleet and Port Pilots on/about 2010-09-21; (d) the San Diego Union-Tribune and CoatingsPro coverage of the barque Star of India's August 2009 haul on the 'Diligence' floating dry-dock at BAE Systems - CoatingsPro reports the shipyard got word during the project that 'Diligence would be put into an early retirement,' and that the Star would be the last ship sheltered at her dock.
    Verification
    verified
    Role
    supporting
    Documentation level
    ship_specific
    Accessed
    2026-09-20
    Study period
    2009-2010
    Population
    BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair and Knight & Carver drydock crews; Maritime Museum of San Diego project workers (2009)
    Limitations
    Trade-press reporting consistent with the government permit record on capacity (4,000-ton), name (Diligence), and operator sequence (BAE retirement, then K&C lease operation). Press accounts are corroborating, not primary; the Star of India haul is documented at BAE in August 2009 while the permit documents the 2010 sale. No asbestos or materials information in any of these sources.
    Atlas source
    true
    Evidence ID
    ev-uss-diligence-afdl48-04
  5. [5]Knight & Carver Yachtcenter, Inc. bankruptcy, No. 3:12-bk-03440 (Bankr. S.D. Cal., filed 2012-03-12) via PACER Monitor public docket index; Megayacht News 'Marine Group Boat Works Takes Over Knight & Carver' (2013-04); The Log 'San Diego's Knight & Carver Goes on the Block' [court_record]
    Locator
    PACER Monitor case 107467 docket header; megayachtnews.com 2013/04 article; thelog.com auction report
    Finding type
    vessel_history
    Finding
    Disposition context: Knight & Carver Yachtcenter, Inc. filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy 2012-03-12 (No. 3:12-bk-03440, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Cal.; dismissed 2013-08-19, terminated 2013-09-04). Reporting on the subsequent wind-down documents that Marine Group Boat Works acquired Knight & Carver's National City yard lease at auction (took over 2013-04-01) but that the company's floating dry dock 'was not part of the Marine Group Boat Works deal' - consistent with the drydock's separate 2013 sale to Peruvian interests recorded by NavSource.
    Verification
    verified
    Role
    context
    Documentation level
    context_only
    Accessed
    2026-09-20
    Study period
    2012-2013
    Limitations
    Operator-level record: the bankruptcy docket names the operating company, not the hull, and contains no asbestos or exposure information; it explains the commercial circumstances of the 2013 disposal, not the hull's condition. Megayacht News describes the excluded dry dock as '400-ton-capacity' - inconsistent with the government permit's 4,000-ton figure; the permit figure controls (discrepancy logged in gaps).
    Atlas source
    true
    Evidence ID
    ev-uss-diligence-afdl48-05
  6. [6]Era construction-practice framing per Corn & Starr (WWII shipbuilding asbestos program, carried into postwar Navy practice) and GAO HRD-80-2 (see ev-uss-diligence-afdl48-07); dock function per the NPDES record (ev-03) [other_primary]
    Locator
    Corn & Starr, AJIM 11(3):359-373 (1987); Water Board order findings (facility activity description: coating application/removal, hull cleaning, engine repair)
    Finding type
    asbestos_application
    Finding
    Class/era inference only: a 1955-built U.S. Navy steel floating drydock carrying ballast/pumping machinery and repair facilities is era-consistent with asbestos-containing gaskets, packing, electrical insulation, millboard, and thermal insulation in machinery and piping - the material suite standard in Navy construction of the period. The dock's repair mission (lifting Navy and commercial vessels for underwater-hull work, coating removal, and mechanical repair) additionally placed its crews around client-vessel insulation suites that commonly contained asbestos through the documented Navy asbestos era.
    Verification
    inferred
    Role
    supporting
    Documentation level
    class_or_era
    Accessed
    2026-09-20
    Study period
    1955 construction era through 1986 Navy service; commercial operation to 2013
    Population
    General Construction trades (Seattle, ~1955); Navy dock operating crews; commercial drydock/repair crews 1986-2013; crews of vessels under repair
    Limitations
    Design/era inference, not a hull record - no construction specification, materials schedule, or survey for this dock was located. Corn & Starr documents the WWII program specifically; its use here is era-boundary context (a 1955 hull sits just past the documented period), so the inference is weaker than for a wartime build. A non-propelled floating dock has a far smaller machinery and inhabited-space footprint than a steam vessel; its asbestos loading would correspondingly be lower. Establishes nothing about quantity, condition, present-day presence, individual exposure, or causation.
    Atlas source
    true
    Evidence ID
    ev-uss-diligence-afdl48-06
  7. [7]GAO, Navy Efforts To Protect Workers From Asbestos Exposure, HRD-80-2 (Oct 18, 1979) [gao]
    Locator
    GAO product page HRD-80-2 (full text blocked, HTTP 403 - product-page description used)
    Finding type
    gov_survey
    Finding
    GAO documented the Navy's asbestos-protection program - standing policy (1975) removed asbestos insulation only when damaged or required for repairs, modified 1979 to selective replacement in high-maintenance areas - meaning original-era insulation typically remained in place aboard Navy hulls for decades unless a yard period disturbed it. A 1955-built service craft in Navy custody through 1986 falls squarely within the documented program era.
    Verification
    verified
    Role
    context
    Documentation level
    class_or_era
    Accessed
    2026-09-20
    Study period
    1979
    Population
    Navy shipyard workers; asbestos program review
    Limitations
    Program-level documentation; GAO fieldwork was at Long Beach and Norfolk Naval Shipyards, not this dock's station or builder. Supports era context for why insulation would persist aboard, not any fact specific to this hull; full text not retrieved (gao.gov blocks automated fetch, HTTP 403) - description via product page.
    Atlas source
    true
    Evidence ID
    ev-uss-diligence-afdl48-07
  8. [8]Keller v. Dravo Corp., 441 F.2d 1239 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied 404 U.S. 1017, 92 S.Ct. 679, 30 L.Ed.2d 665 (1972) [court_record]
    Locator
    Opinion at 441 F.2d 1243-44 (vessel-status holding); reporter citation cross-verified via multiple case-law databases this session (CourtListener API throttled - see search_ledger)
    Finding type
    litigation_documented
    Finding
    Litigation-posture context for the vessel type (not this hull, not asbestos): Fifth Circuit doctrine holds that 'as a matter of law, a floating dry dock is not a vessel when it is moored and in use as a dry dock' - Keller v. Dravo Corp., 441 F.2d 1239, 1244 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied 404 U.S. 1017 (1972), following Atkins v. Greenville Shipping Corp., 411 F.2d 279 (5th Cir. 1969) and Chahoc v. Hunt Shipyard, 431 F.2d 576 (5th Cir. 1970). Workers injured on moored floating drydocks were accordingly confined to Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act remedies rather than vessel-owner negligence/unseaworthiness theories.
    Verification
    verified
    Role
    context
    Documentation level
    class_or_era
    Accessed
    2026-09-20
    Study period
    1969-1972 (doctrine); applies to moored-dock operations
    Population
    Floating-drydock workers generally (type context)
    Limitations
    Doctrinal context for the vessel type only - an LHWCA/admiralty vessel-status ruling, not asbestos litigation, not naming this hull, and not an exposure finding. Relevant to how injury claims by drydock crews were channeled; the Keller court expressly declined an absolute rule that a floating drydock can never be a vessel. Citation verified against reporter text reproduced in case-law databases; a direct CourtListener pull remains an open lead.
    Atlas source
    true
    Evidence ID
    ev-uss-diligence-afdl48-08
  9. [9]Batch-602 search ledger (this record): CourtListener API v4 attempt (HTTP 429); web-indexed court-document sweeps; Freeman v. BAE Systems order (brownsims.com mirror); NavSource DANFS-absence note; NHHC/CGC sources distinguishing collision hulls [other_primary]
    Locator
    search_ledger rows sl-uss-diligence-afdl48-07 through sl-uss-diligence-afdl48-09; Freeman order PDF (Longshore Update mirror)
    Finding type
    historical_record
    Finding
    Litigation and name-collision sweep: a fresh CourtListener API v4 query was throttled (HTTP 429, shared 125/day quota, ~15h reset) and deferred per the backoff rule; web-indexed court-record sweeps returned no opinion naming AFDL-48 or this drydock. One operator-level hit classified and excluded: heirs of an insulation contractor sued BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair Inc. f/k/a Southwest Marine, Inc. alleging asbestos exposure 'at various shipyards in California, Washington and Hawaii' ~1980-mid-1990s (Freeman v. BAE Systems et al., S.D. Cal.) - an asbestos pleading naming the dock's then-operator but not the hull; excluded as non-qualifying. Name-collision hulls logged: USS Diligence (BAR-18), a WWII Lend-Lease repair ship transferred to the Royal Navy as HMS Diligence (the 'Diligence AR-18' of the PRIMARY source row - a different hull); USCGC Diligence (WMEC-616), a 210-ft cutter; and the 18th-19th century revenue cutters of the same name.
    Verification
    partial
    Role
    negative_finding
    Documentation level
    ship_specific
    Accessed
    2026-09-20
    Study period
    2026-09-20
    Limitations
    Sweep partially blocked - the live CourtListener API quota was exhausted before a fresh query ran, so no docket-level search of this hull was possible; the web-indexed sweep is a weaker instrument. Absence of a located pleading is not proof no claim ever existed. The Freeman classification is made at the pleading stage (allegation, unadjudicated) and names an operator, not this hull. No asbestos opinion naming this dock was found by any instrument used.
    Atlas source
    true
    Evidence ID
    ev-uss-diligence-afdl48-09
  10. [10]Batch-602 search ledger (this record): NavSource 09/67/6748.htm; shipbuildinghistory auxafd table; San Diego RWQCB R9-2010-0096 file; PACER Monitor 3:12-bk-03440; trade press; DANFS/NVR/MARAD/NARA checks [other_primary]
    Locator
    search_ledger rows sl-uss-diligence-afdl48-01 through sl-uss-diligence-afdl48-14
    Finding type
    historical_record
    Finding
    No qualifying ship-specific asbestos record located: no asbestos survey, abatement contract, materials schedule, hazmat disclosure, or docketed case naming AFDL-48/Diligence was found in the public sources searched - the NavSource and shipbuildinghistory compilations, the California Water Board permit file, the Knight & Carver bankruptcy and trade-press coverage contain no asbestos or insulation-material statement, and no DANFS, NVR, MARAD, or NARA document exists for this hull in located sources.
    Verification
    verified
    Role
    negative_finding
    Documentation level
    ship_specific
    Accessed
    2026-09-20
    Study period
    2026-09-20
    Limitations
    Absence of a located public record does not prove absence of asbestos aboard - a 1955 Navy service craft is era-consistent with asbestos-containing materials, and the hull's resale to private and foreign owners means any retained material passed through commercial hands without a located disclosure. Does not establish presence or absence; does not establish or defeat any exposure claim or legal eligibility.
    Atlas source
    true
    Evidence ID
    ev-uss-diligence-afdl48-10
  11. [11]Ministerio de Infraestructura y Transporte / MTOP (Ecuador), 'Subsecretaria de Puertos y Transporte Maritimo y Fluvial realizo inspeccion subacuatica' (obraspublicas.gob.ec, 2017); PortalPortuario syndication 2017-09-19 [other_primary]
    Locator
    obraspublicas.gob.ec news item (Manabi dateline); portalportuario.cl Ecuador section
    Finding type
    historical_record
    Finding
    Post-disposition lead (unverified): in September 2017 Ecuador's Ministerio de Transporte y Obras Publicas (SPTMF) reported an underwater inspection of a floating dry dock named 'Ciudad de Paita' at Manabi, Ecuador - including habitability quarters, galley, and generator spaces - concluding it passed reinspection for ship-repair service. The name matches the dock's documented 2013 installation port (Paita, Peru); whether 'Ciudad de Paita' is this hull operating onward under Ecuadorian inspection or a different dock is not established by the source.
    Verification
    unverified
    Role
    archival_lead
    Documentation level
    context_only
    Accessed
    2026-09-20
    Study period
    2017
    Limitations
    Name-coincidence lead only - the Ecuadorian government report does not link 'Ciudad de Paita' to ex-AFDL-48/ex-Diligence; it establishes that a floating dock of that name, with crew habitability spaces, was inspected for repair service in Ecuadorian waters in 2017. If confirmed as this hull it would be ship-specific disposition evidence; until then it is a lead, not a finding. No asbestos information.
    Atlas source
    true
    Evidence ID
    ev-uss-diligence-afdl48-11
  12. [12]NARA Ship Plan Index (archives.gov/research/cartographic/ship-index) - AFDL block checked; NARA RG 24 deck-log guidance; BuShips contract-record path [other_primary]
    Locator
    Ship Plan Index AFDL entries (AFDL-40/41/42/47 present; AFDL-48 absent); archives.gov logbook guidance
    Finding type
    historical_record
    Finding
    Archival leads (not retrieved - no reproduction spend authorized): (a) NARA RG 24 post-1947 deck logs for AFDL-48 - the primary unconsulted source for the dock's 1955-1986 station(s), movements under tow, and crew; (b) BuShips/BuSandA contract and design records for the General Construction Co. dock (Seattle, ~1955) - the potential materials/machinery-layout source; (c) the 1986 DRMO/Navy sale file - buyer identification and any hazmat terms; (d) NARA cartographic Ship Plan Index CHECKED and AFDL-48 is NOT listed (AFDL-40, -41, -42, -47 appear on RG 385 microfilm 63531026) - a located negative, not merely an unsurveyed holding.
    Verification
    unverified
    Role
    archival_lead
    Documentation level
    context_only
    Accessed
    2026-09-20
    Study period
    1955-2013 records
    Limitations
    Record-holding mapping only - no document-level retrieval performed. Whether any of these holdings contains asbestos-specific information for this dock is unknown until surveyed; the Ship Plan Index absence is a verified negative for that one index (plans may still exist under another series or with the builder). Nothing in this row is an asbestos finding.
    Atlas source
    true
    Evidence ID
    ev-uss-diligence-afdl48-12

Attribution

Compiled by
Paul Danziger; Rod de Llano
Publisher
Danziger & De Llano, LLP
License
CC-BY-4.0
Citation
Danziger, P., and De Llano, R. (2026). AsbestosAtlas Navy Vessel Asbestos Exposure Dataset. Danziger & De Llano, LLP. DOI: not yet assigned
Dataset version
asbestosatlas-ships-2026.10.12-rc.1
DOI
not yet assigned