The record
In a published opinion decided February 6, 2026, the New Jersey Appellate Division addressed attorney-disqualification issues in the multi-county talc litigation, arising from a former J&J/LTL attorney's later collaboration with plaintiffs' counsel (In re Talc Based Powder Products Litigation, No. A-0215-24).
Claim scope
The published appellate treatment of the Conlan disqualification matter within the New Jersey talc multicounty litigation.
What this source does not establish
Reporter citation not yet assigned — cite by docket number and date. The opinion concerns attorney ethics and disqualification; it is not a merits ruling on talc liability.
Limitations
Cite as No. A-0215-24 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Feb. 6, 2026) (approved for publication).
Source
Case Citation — N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Docket No. A-0215-24 (Feb. 6, 2026), approved for publication — N.J. Super. reporter citation NOT YET VERIFIED