The record
J&J concealed its funding of a 2008 article by Joshua Muscat and Michael Huncharek concluding there is no indication cosmetic talc causes cancer.
Claim scope
A published opinion recounting plaintiffs' evidence of undisclosed sponsorship of a named 2008 peer-reviewed article.
What this source does not establish
I did NOT resolve the Muscat & Huncharek 2008 article to a PMID in this session. Do not cite the article itself until its PMID is verified; cite only the opinion's statement.
Limitations
Ingham recites each internal document under the express predicate "According to Plaintiffs' evidence" and under the standard "Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict." The court's HOLDING is that Plaintiffs made a submissible case for punitive damages; it is NOT an independent judicial finding that each recounted document says what plaintiffs said it says. Phrase as: 'the Missouri Court of Appeals, upholding the punitive award, recounted plaintiffs' evidence that...' Follow-up needed: resolve the Muscat/Huncharek 2008 PMID before the page names the journal.
Source
Case Citation — Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson, No. ED107476 (Mo. Ct. App. E.D. June 23, 2020)