The record
Johnson & Johnson characterized the Ingham verdict in its own public securities filings as 'unique' and 'not representative of other claims,' as recounted by the Third Circuit.
Claim scope
J&J's own characterization of Ingham, quoted by a federal appellate court from the record at App. 2692-93; and the court's use of it: 'Nothing in the record suggests Ingham—one of 49 pre-bankruptcy trials and described even by J&J as "unique" and "not representative," App. 2692-93—was the new norm.'
What this source does not establish
It does not establish the securities filings' accuracy, nor that Ingham was legally erroneous. It cuts against, not for, treating Ingham as typical of talc outcomes.
Limitations
Same indirect citation resolution. The underlying securities filing is cited only as a record appendix page; cite the opinion, not the filing.
Source
Case Citation — In re LTL Mgmt., LLC, 64 F.4th 84 (3d Cir. 2023)