The record
The Third Circuit held that consumers who bought talcum powder but suffered no physical injury lack Article III standing to sue over the purchase.
Claim scope
A published federal appellate holding limiting economic-injury consumer class actions over talc. Reporter cite independently confirmed by citation-lookup, which resolved '903 F.3d 278' to this exact Published cluster (4532945).
What this source does not establish
It says nothing about whether talc contains asbestos or causes disease; it is purely a standing holding, and it does not affect personal-injury claims by people who developed disease.
Limitations
Reporter cite DIRECTLY INDEXED and independently VERIFIED via the citation-lookup endpoint (status 200).
Source
Case Citation — In re Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Prods. Mktg., Sales Practices & Liab. Litig., 903 F.3d 278 (3d Cir. 2018)