Government survey or HHE evidence class; this is not a measure of exposure severity.
Pacific Coast Cluster · Oakland, CaliforniaMoore Dry Dock Company
Oakland Estuary, Oakland, California · 1905–1961 · 100+ ships built in WWII · Ranked 82nd in U.S. war production
Bottom Line Up Front
Moore Dry Dock Company employed approximately 37,000 workers at its WWII peak, building over 100 ships — including submarine tenders and amphibious dock landing ships — on the Oakland Estuary between 1938 and 1945. The U.S. Maritime Commission's Fleischer-Drinker survey (1946) documented amosite pipe covering and boiler block insulation being cut and fitted in confined engine rooms and boiler spaces at Navy contract yards of this type; the survey now faces a retraction call (C&EN, July 2026) for understating the hazard. The W.A. Simons Asbestos Trust's California Site List (September 2020) independently confirms Moore Dry Dock as a High-exposure site (Exposure Level H). Moore Dry Dock is also the origin of the Moore Dry Dock Standards — the NLRB's landmark 1950 rules for secondary picketing — making it one of the most legally significant shipyards in U.S. labor law.
Facility Overview
Moore Dry Dock Company traces its origins to 1905, when Robert S. Moore, his brother Joseph A. Moore, and John Thomas Scott purchased the National Iron Works at Hunter's Point in San Francisco and founded Moore & Scott Iron Works. The 1906 earthquake and fire destroyed the original facility; in 1909, Moore and Scott relocated across the Bay to purchase the W.A. Boole & Son Shipyard at the foot of Adeline Street on the Oakland Estuary. In 1917, Moore bought out Scott and renamed the company Moore Shipbuilding Company; in 1922, as post-WWI demand collapsed, the yard shifted to repair work and was renamed Moore Dry Dock Company.
When WWII shipbuilding demand surged, Moore rapidly expanded its construction capabilities. Between 1938 and the last vessel launched in 1945, the yard built over 100 ships for the U.S. Navy and merchant marine, including submarine tenders (USS Greenlet, ASR-10) and amphibious dock landing ships. Moore ranked 82nd among all U.S. corporations in the value of WWII military production contracts — a remarkable standing for a single-yard commercial shipbuilder. Peak employment reached approximately 37,000 workers during 1943–1944.
After the war, Moore returned to its repair-yard focus. Shipbuilding ceased in 1945; repair operations continued until the yard closed in 1961. The Adeline Street site was subsequently acquired by Schnitzer Steel (now Radius Recycling), which operates a scrap metal facility there today.
Fleischer-Drinker 1946: USMC-Commissioned Pipe Covering Survey
The primary government industrial hygiene record for Navy contract yards like Moore Dry Dock is the Fleischer-Drinker 1946 survey: "A Health Survey of Pipe Covering Operations in Constructing Naval Vessels," published in the Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Vol. 28, No. 1 (1946). The study was commissioned by the U.S. Maritime Commission and authored by Comdr. Walter E. Fleischer (MC, USNR), Frederick J. Viles Jr., Robert L. Gade, and Philip Drinker, Chief Health Consultant to the U.S. Maritime Commission.
The survey examined pipe covering operations at four yards — two Government Navy Yards (A and B) and two Navy Contract Yards (C and D) — documenting dust counts during seven distinct operations: laying out and cutting amosite felt, band saw cutting, sewing and preparation of boots and jackets, cement mixing, molding, grinding, and on-board ship installation. The survey found that amosite pipe covering and felt had been used on "almost all destroyers built since [1934] and on all other combat vessels built since before the War," and documented visible asbestosis in workers at the initial inspection yard that triggered the broader survey series.
Moore Dry Dock, as a major Navy contract yard ranked 82nd in U.S. war production, used the same Maritime Commission-specified amosite pipe covering and boiler block insulation documented in the Fleischer-Drinker survey. The survey's findings — that cutting and fitting amosite in confined engine rooms and boiler spaces generated hazardous dust concentrations — apply directly to the occupational conditions at Moore Dry Dock during WWII peak production.
What the Survey Documents at Navy Contract Yards
- Amosite pipe covering (block and felt) cut and fitted by insulators in confined engine rooms
- Boiler block insulation applied in boiler spaces — band saw cutting generated the highest dust counts
- Cement mixing: asbestos cement dumped into mixing troughs raised "considerable dust" with no exhaust ventilation
- On-board ship installation: insulators worked in unventilated compartments during peak production
- Initial inspection found "what appeared to be asbestosis" in workers at the triggering Navy contract yard
2026 Retraction Call — C&EN (July 8, 2026)
The Fleischer-Drinker 1946 study — which concluded that pipe covering operations were "not a dangerous occupation" — is now facing a formal call for retraction published in Chemical & Engineering News (C&EN) on July 8, 2026. The retraction call argues that the study's conclusions were scientifically unsupported and that the study was used for decades by asbestos manufacturers to defend against worker health claims. The retraction call is itself a significant evidentiary development: it confirms that the 1946 survey's "safe" conclusion was contested, and that the underlying dust count data — which the survey did document — showed hazardous conditions.
C&EN: 80-year-old U.S. Navy asbestos study faces call for retraction (July 2026)Source Integrity Note — Survey Scope
The Fleischer-Drinker survey anonymized its four study yards as A, B, C, and D. Moore Dry Dock has not been publicly identified as one of the four specific yards surveyed. The survey's findings are applied here as evidence of conditions at Navy contract yards of the same type and scale as Moore Dry Dock during the same production period. The original USMC industrial hygiene survey series documents, held in NARA RG 178, may contain Moore Dry Dock-specific dust count data that has not been separately published. Attorneys seeking Moore Dry Dock-specific survey records should submit a NARA reference inquiry to the National Archives at College Park (RG 178, Entry NM-22 or equivalent).
W.A. Simons Asbestos Trust — California Site List (2020)
The W.A. Simons Asbestos Trust's California Site List (September 2020) lists MOORE DRY DOCK–OAKLAND, CA (ADELINE ST) at Exposure Level H (High). The Simons Trust site list is a claims-administration document reflecting the trust's determination, based on its own evidence review, that workers at listed sites were exposed to asbestos-containing products for which the trust is liable.
The "High" exposure designation — the second-highest level in the Simons Trust's four-tier scale (VH, H, S, L) — is consistent with the documented use of amosite pipe covering and boiler block insulation at a major WWII Navy contract yard with a peak workforce of 37,000. The Simons Trust listing covers both the WWII construction period and the post-war repair period, reflecting the trust's recognition that asbestos-containing materials installed during wartime construction remained in place and were disturbed during subsequent maintenance and repair operations.
Significance for Attorneys
The W.A. Simons Trust site listing at Exposure Level H provides an independent, claims-administration confirmation of high-exposure conditions at Moore Dry Dock that is separate from and corroborative of the Fleischer-Drinker survey series. Workers or their survivors with documented employment at Moore Dry Dock may have viable trust fund claims against the W.A. Simons Asbestos Trust in addition to any product liability claims against manufacturers of the amosite pipe covering and boiler block insulation documented at the yard.
Historical Context: The "Moore Dry Dock Standards" (1950)
Moore Dry Dock is historically significant beyond its asbestos exposure record. In 1950, the National Labor Relations Board decided Sailors' Union of the Pacific (Moore Dry Dock Co.), 92 NLRB 547, 27 LRRM 1108 (1950), establishing the "Moore Dry Dock Standards" — the NLRB's foundational rules for determining when a union's secondary picketing at a neutral employer's premises is protected primary activity rather than an unlawful secondary boycott.
The case arose when the Sailors' Union of the Pacific picketed Moore Dry Dock's Oakland facility while a ship owned by a separate company (Samsoc) was in dry dock for repairs. The NLRB held that the picketing was lawful primary activity — not an unlawful secondary boycott — because the ship was the union's primary target and was temporarily located at Moore's neutral premises. The four-part test established in the decision (the "Moore Dry Dock Standards") remains the controlling NLRB standard for situs picketing more than 70 years later.
The labor law significance of the yard is relevant to asbestos litigation context because it establishes the occupational trades present at Moore Dry Dock — sailors, boilermakers, pipefitters, insulators — and the scale of union activity at the facility. The same trades that were the subject of the 1950 NLRB case were the trades most heavily exposed to amosite pipe covering and boiler block insulation during WWII construction and post-war repair operations.
Sailors' Union of the Pacific (Moore Dry Dock Co.), 92 NLRB 547 (1950) — QuimbeeAsbestos Products Documented at Moore Dry Dock
The Fleischer-Drinker survey and corroborating records document the following asbestos-containing products at Navy contract yards of Moore Dry Dock's type and scale. All WWII-era Pacific Coast Navy contract yards used the same Maritime Commission-specified product set.
| Product | Manufacturer(s) | Period | Status | Primary Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amosite pipe covering (block and felt) | Johns-Manville Corp.; Eagle-Picher Industries | 1938–1945 | Verified | Fleischer-Drinker 1946 (J. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. Vol. 28) — USMC-commissioned survey |
| Asbestos boiler block insulation | Johns-Manville Corp.; Owens-Illinois | 1938–1945 | Verified | Fleischer-Drinker 1946 — band saw cutting documented as highest-dust operation |
| Asbestos gaskets (valve/flange) | Garlock, Inc.; John Crane, Inc. | 1938–1961 | Probable | W.A. Simons Trust CA Site List (2020) — H exposure level; standard repair-yard product |
| Asbestos millboard (bulkhead/deck) | Johns-Manville Corp. | 1938–1945 | Probable | Standard WWII Pacific Coast Navy contract yard product (Fleischer-Drinker 1946) |
| Asbestos packing (pump/valve) | Garlock, Inc.; John Crane, Inc. | 1938–1961 | Probable | Standard repair-yard product; exposure window consistent with Simons Trust H designation |
"Verified" = named in a primary government survey document or trust site list. "Probable" = consistent with documented product use at comparable WWII Pacific Coast Navy contract yards; not yet named in a Moore Dry Dock-specific retrieved document.
Bay Area Cluster: Moore Dry Dock vs. Marinship vs. Hunter's Point
Moore Dry Dock, Marinship Corporation, and Hunter's Point Naval Shipyard form the core Bay Area shipyard cluster — three yards within 15 miles of each other, all active during WWII, with distinct evidence profiles.
| Factor | Moore Dry Dock (Oakland) | Marinship (Sausalito) | Hunter's Point (San Francisco) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator | Commercial (Moore family) | W.A. Bechtel Co. (commercial) | U.S. Navy (federal) |
| Facility evidence class | Facility evidence class — Tier 2 of 3 · Gov. Survey / HHE | Facility evidence class — Tier 2 of 3 · Gov. Survey / HHE | Facility evidence class — Tier 3 of 3 · Environmental / Historical |
| Peak workforce | ~37,000 (1943–44) | ~20,000 (1943–44) | ~17,000 (est.) |
| Primary source | Fleischer-Drinker 1946 (USMC); W.A. Simons Trust H | USMC IHS 1942–44 (NARA RG 178); W.A. Simons Trust | Historical records; EPA Superfund |
| Trust exposure level | H (High) — W.A. Simons Trust | High — W.A. Simons Trust | Not listed |
| Closure | 1961 (commercial) | 1946 (post-WWII) | 1974 (Navy transfer) |
| Notable context | Origin of 'Moore Dry Dock Standards' (NLRB 1950) | James v. Marinship (1944) — Thurgood Marshall | EPA Superfund site (active) |
Further Reading
Further reading: shipyard asbestos exposure — WikiMesothelioma.com
About the Authors
Paul Danziger
Founding Partner, Danziger & De Llano, LLP
Paul Danziger has represented mesothelioma patients and their families for over 25 years. He holds a J.D. from Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law and has secured hundreds of millions in verdicts and settlements for shipyard workers, veterans, and industrial tradespeople exposed to asbestos. His practice focuses exclusively on asbestos-related disease litigation.
Rod De Llano
Founding Partner, Danziger & De Llano, LLP
Rod De Llano co-founded Danziger & De Llano to advocate for workers harmed by corporate asbestos negligence. With a career spanning over two decades in toxic tort litigation, he has developed deep expertise in shipyard exposure patterns, product identification, and occupational disease causation. He represents clients nationwide in mesothelioma and asbestosis claims.
Danziger & De Llano, LLP funds the Asbestos Atlas as a public-interest research project. The dataset is published under CC BY 4.0 and sourced exclusively from primary records (PubMed, NIOSH, EPA, NARA). No law-firm marketing material is used as a data source. See Methodology for the full circularity firewall protocol.