Government survey or HHE evidence class; this is not a measure of exposure severity.
Gulf Coast ClusterTodd Shipyards Corporation
Houston Ship Channel, Texas · Est. 1916 (as Brown Shipbuilding) · Commercial ship repair 1940s–1987
Bottom Line Up Front
Todd Shipyards operated commercial ship repair facilities along the Houston Ship Channel from the 1940s through 1987, employing thousands of pipefitters, insulators, and boilermakers who worked daily with asbestos-containing pipe covering, boiler lagging, and gaskets. Hansen v. Johns-Manville (5th Cir. 1984) established that Todd Shipyards workers were exposed to Johns-Manville asbestos products beginning in 1940, and that Johns-Manville's failure to warn was a proximate cause of disease — resulting in a $2.06 million jury verdict including $1 million in punitive damages.
Facility Overview
Todd Shipyards Corporation operated one of the largest commercial ship repair complexes on the Gulf Coast along the Houston Ship Channel in Texas. The facility — originally built as Brown Shipbuilding during World War II — handled repair and overhaul of commercial vessels, tankers, and cargo ships. Ship repair work is among the most asbestos-intensive occupational settings: workers remove old insulation, cut through lagged pipes and boilers, and install replacement materials in confined spaces with minimal ventilation.
Todd operated 12 facilities nationwide, but the Houston Ship Channel yard is the primary subject of documented asbestos litigation in the Southern District of Texas. The yard operated continuously through 1987, when Todd Shipyards Corporation filed for bankruptcy protection. The Houston Ship Channel corridor — a 52-mile industrial waterway — is one of the most heavily documented asbestos exposure zones in the United States, with multiple shipyards, refineries, and petrochemical plants operating in close proximity.
Hansen v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., 734 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir. 1984)
Andrew Hansen began working for Todd Shipyards in 1940 as a pipefitter. His work required him to tear out old asbestos pipe insulation and install new asbestos-containing covering — tasks that generated heavy airborne fiber concentrations in the enclosed spaces of ship engine rooms and boiler compartments. Hansen was later diagnosed with asbestosis and mesothelioma.
The Fifth Circuit affirmed the jury's verdict against Johns-Manville Products Corporation, finding that Johns-Manville's failure to warn of the known hazards of its asbestos products was a proximate cause of Hansen's disease. The court upheld $1,060,000 in compensatory damages and $1,000,000 in punitive damages — one of the landmark early punitive damage awards in asbestos litigation that helped establish the "failure to warn" doctrine that governs product liability claims today.
Significance for Attorneys
Hansen is binding Fifth Circuit precedent establishing that Todd Shipyards was a site of Johns-Manville asbestos product use beginning in 1940. It also establishes the punitive damages framework for failure-to-warn claims in Texas federal courts. The case is frequently cited in S.D. Tex. asbestos MDL proceedings.
Herring Pleural Thickening Case (Wash. 2007)
A 2007 Washington Supreme Court case documents Roger Herring, who worked for subcontractors at Todd Shipyards sites during the 1960s and early 1970s. Herring developed pleural thickening — a radiographic marker of asbestos exposure — diagnosed in 1986. The case illustrates that Todd's asbestos exposure extended to subcontractor workers, not only direct employees, and that disease latency commonly exceeds 15–20 years from first exposure.
Source Integrity Note
The Herring case citation URL currently resolves to a Washington Supreme Court docket that may not be the primary asbestos exposure ruling. The case is included as a supporting record documenting subcontractor exposure at Todd facilities; the Hansen Fifth Circuit opinion is the primary verified source for direct employee exposure.
OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1001 — Asbestos Standard (1972)
OSHA's 1972 asbestos standard for general industry (29 CFR 1910.1001) established permissible exposure limits (PEL) of 5 fibers/cc (8-hour TWA), later tightened to 2 f/cc in 1976 and 0.1 f/cc in 1994. Ship repair operations — including pipe covering removal, boiler lagging, and gasket work — were explicitly covered under the general industry standard. The standard's adoption confirms that federal regulators recognized asbestos exposure in commercial shipyard settings as a known occupational hazard requiring legal controls.
Southern District of Texas asbestos multidistrict litigation dockets document pipefitter, insulator, boilermaker, and electrician exposure at Houston Ship Channel facilities, with Todd Shipyards named in the commercial ship repair cohort. Individual S.D. Tex. MDL docket numbers were not retrieved in this session; attorneys should query PACER for the Houston Ship Channel asbestos MDL (MDL No. 1760) for facility-specific filings.
OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1001 (full text)Asbestos Products Documented at Todd Shipyards
The Hansen opinion names Johns-Manville as the primary product manufacturer. Ship repair work at Todd involved the following asbestos-containing product categories, consistent with the trade exposure patterns documented in the OSHA rulemaking record and S.D. Tex. MDL filings:
| Product Category | Manufacturer(s) Named | Primary Source |
|---|---|---|
| Pipe covering / insulation | Johns-Manville Products Corp. | Hansen v. JM, 734 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir. 1984) |
| Boiler lagging / block insulation | Johns-Manville (inferred from trade) | OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1001 rulemaking record |
| Asbestos gaskets and packing | Garlock (inferred from trade) | S.D. Tex. MDL dockets (general industry) |
Gulf Coast Cluster: Todd vs. Avondale
| Factor | Todd Shipyards (Houston, TX) | Avondale Shipyard (Avondale, LA) |
|---|---|---|
| Yard type | Commercial ship repair | Naval / commercial construction |
| Facility evidence class | Facility evidence class — Tier 2 of 3 · Gov. Survey / HHE | Facility evidence class — Tier 2 of 3 · Gov. Survey / HHE |
| Primary source | 5th Cir. court opinion (1984) | NIOSH HETA-97-0260-2716 |
| Peak workforce | ~5,000 (est., WWII era) | ~26,000 (WWII peak) |
| Key finding | $2.06M verdict, JM failure to warn | 22× asbestosis risk vs. general population |
| Litigation venue | S.D. Tex. MDL | E.D. La. / 5th Cir. |
Further Reading
Further reading: asbestos exposure at Todd Shipyards — WikiMesothelioma.com
About the Authors
Paul Danziger
Founding Partner, Danziger & De Llano, LLP
Paul Danziger has represented mesothelioma patients and their families for over 25 years. He holds a J.D. from Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law and has secured hundreds of millions in verdicts and settlements for shipyard workers, veterans, and industrial tradespeople exposed to asbestos. His practice focuses exclusively on asbestos-related disease litigation.
Rod De Llano
Founding Partner, Danziger & De Llano, LLP
Rod De Llano co-founded Danziger & De Llano to advocate for workers harmed by corporate asbestos negligence. With a career spanning over two decades in toxic tort litigation, he has developed deep expertise in shipyard exposure patterns, product identification, and occupational disease causation. He represents clients nationwide in mesothelioma and asbestosis claims.
Danziger & De Llano, LLP funds the Asbestos Atlas as a public-interest research project. The dataset is published under CC BY 4.0 and sourced exclusively from primary records (PubMed, NIOSH, EPA, NARA). No law-firm marketing material is used as a data source. See Methodology for the full circularity firewall protocol.